Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Dennis Nevolo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Nevolo analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Dennis Nevolo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Nevolo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.02% of points on their second serve, while Nevolo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.5% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nevolo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 58.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nevolo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 56.06% of matches played (W/L 37/ 29), with Nevolo winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 115/ 90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Nevolo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 46/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 25/ 28).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.77% of matches (W/L 29/ 23), where as Nevolo has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times and Nevolo being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Nevolo winning 0. The last match between Krueger and Nevolo was at the USA F11, 24-03-2016, Second, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Nevolo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Nevolo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Nevolo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 272 while Nevolo has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nevolo has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 40.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nevolo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
251
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
345
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
53% (402-358)
Career Total W/L
57% (198-151)
61% (22-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$500
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Dennis Nevolo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:0 | 1:47:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (37/74) | 47% (28/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (27/37) | 71% (20/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (19/37) | 48% (15/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (24/59) | 38% (28/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Dennis Nevolo
50%
(
37 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Dennis Nevolo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (22/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (51/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (457/421) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 163 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:25 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 323.31 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1803/2766) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1251/1803) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (501/963) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (108/266) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1169/2939) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 66% (21/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (22/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (16/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Aidan Mayo
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Liam Draxl
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Mitchell Krueger
51%
(
56 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
6
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
52%
(
28 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Mitchell Krueger
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Filip Misolic
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Stefan Kozlov
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Dennis Nevolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Dennis Nevolo
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Dennis Nevolo
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Nevolo
Player
Patrick Daciek
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Nevolo
Player
Guy Orly Iradukunda
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Allen Johnson
Player
Dennis Nevolo
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Dennis Nevolo
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Nevolo
Player
Samuel Monette
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
96
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alexander Ward
Player
Dennis Nevolo
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
46)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dennis Nevolo
Player
Alexei Popyrin
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
10
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
90%
(
28 of
31)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Dennis Nevolo
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
39%
(
38 of
98)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Nevolo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mitchell Krueger
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
